NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

Organization

Victory Commercial Management Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “VCM”, and where appropriate, the terms “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” are also referred to VCM and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries as a whole) was incorporated on July 5, 2017 under the laws of Nevada.

On July 13, 2017, VCM formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Victory Commercial Investment Ltd. (“VCI”) under the laws of British Virgin Islands.

Sino Pride Development Limited (“Sino Pride”) is a Hong Kong company, incorporated on May 26, 1989. Sino Pride is a holding company that directly owns an 80% equity interest in Dalian Victory Plaza Development Co., Ltd. (“DVPD”) and directly owns a 95% equity interest in Dalian Victory Business Management Co., Ltd. (“DVBM”).

DVPD was incorporated as a Sino-foreign cooperative joint venture on March 29, 1993 under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”). Sino Pride owns an 80% equity interest of DVPD while Dalian Victory Development Co., Limited (“DVDC”), a state-owned enterprise in China, owns a 20% equity interest in DVPD.

DVBM was incorporated as a joint venture on September 12, 2000 under the laws of the PRC. Sino Pride owns a 95% equity interest in DVBM and DVPD owns a 5% equity interest in DVBM.

DVPM was incorporated on June 6, 2018 as limited liability company under the laws of the PRC. Sino Pride owns 100% of the equity of DVPM. DVPM was formed as a property management company and will play a similar role as DVBM to improve the management of Victory Plaza. DVPM did not have any business activities as of the issuance date of this report.

Iven International Group Limited, is a company registered in Hong Kong (“Iven”). From October 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017, Alex Brown beneficially owned 100% of Iven, among which, a 70% equity interest was held directly, and a 30% equity interest was held indirectly through Dalian Yiwen New Materials Technology Development Co., Ltd, a PRC entity 80% owned by Alex Brown and 20% owned by his spouse. On September 30, 2017, Alex Brown and Dalian Yiwen New Material Technology Development Co., Ltd transferred their respective ownership of Iven to Winner Ascent Investment Limited, a Hong Kong limited liability company solely owned by Alex Brown.

Victory Plaza Holding Limited, (“VP Holding”) a BVI company, was the original owner of Sino Pride. VP Holding incurred significant losses from the operations of Sino Pride and its subsidiaries DVPD and DVBM. VP Holding and Sino Pride had no relationship or affiliation with us or Alex Brown prior to the corporate restructuring.

November 30, 2016 Transaction

In November 2016, Iven entered and executed an agreement of “Assignment of Common Stock and Debt Rights” (“the Original Agreement”) with VP Holding, the former shareholder of Sino pride. Pursuant to the Original Agreement, Iven acquired all 30,000,000 shares of common stock of Sino Pride then outstanding and assumed a shareholder loan and loan interest totaling $52,750,000 (Sino Pride owed to VP Holding) for a nominal consideration of HK$ 1 (approximately US$0.13) from VP Holding. Change of ownership in Sino Pride from VP Holding to Iven had no impact on Sino Pride’s ownership in DVPD and DVBM (operating entities).

Iven was a private shell company with no operations or nominal assets, which is 100% directly and indirectly owned by Mr. Brown. Iven was the legal acquirer in the November 30, 2016 acquisition. At the date of acquisition, Sino Pride was a holding company of two China-based operating entities, DVPD and DVBM. The accounting acquirer usually is the combining entity whose relative size (measured in, for example, assets, revenues, or earnings) is significantly larger than that of the other combining entity or entities as per ASC 805-10-55-13. Thus, Sino Pride and Subsidiaries were treated as the accounting acquirer in connection with the November 2016 transaction.

The November 2016 transaction was treated as a reverse acquisition or recapitalization. The accounting treatment is similar to that resulting from a reverse acquisition, except that no goodwill or other intangible assets should be recorded. Accordingly, the historical financial statements are those of Sino Pride and its Subsidiaries.

September 4, 2017 Transaction

On September 4, 2017, VCI signed an agreement of “Assignment of All Outstanding Shares and All Debt Rights Agreement” (“the Agreement”) with Iven. Pursuant to the Agreement, VCI acquired all 30,000,000 shares of common stock of Sino Pride then outstanding and assumed shareholder debt and loan rights totaling HK$ 493,807,633 (approximately $64,208,000) (Sino Pride owed to VP Holding) including an outstanding shareholder loan of HK$ 408,409,628 (approximately $53,093,000) for a nominal consideration of HK$ 1 (approximately US$0.13) from Iven. The change of ownership in Sino Pride from Iven to VCI had no impact on Sino Pride’s ownership in DVPD and DVBM (operating entities).

Iven and VCI were under common control of our controlling shareholder. The transfer of ownership in Sino Pride from Iven to VCI was a part of the corporate restructuring to prepare the Company to list in the U.S. capital markets.

The Company accounted for the September 2017 transaction as a transaction between entities under common control based on guidance provided by ASC 805-50-25. Following the above transactions, VCI gained control over Sino Pride and its subsidiaries, and, as a result, VCM gained control over VCI, Sino Pride and its Subsidiaries.

The Company together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, VCI, Sino Pride and majority owned subsidiaries, DVBM and DVPM were effectively controlled by the same shareholder, Mr. Brown before and after the September 2017 corporate restructuring, and is considered under common control, which has been accounted for similar to the pooling method of accounting. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the current corporate structure had been in existence at the beginning of the periods presented. Accordingly, the historical financial statements are those of Sino Pride and its Subsidiaries.

Segment Information

The Company and its subsidiaries generate most of the income from rental and building management services. The Company manages one shopping center currently. Geographically, all income is generated from Dalian, China.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As indicated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss of $2,755,378 and $2,182,426 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively; a net loss of $10,272,120 and $4,860,763 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively; and has a deficit of $203,156,330 at September 30, 2019. The Company has an unrestricted cash balance of $195,404 as of September 30, 2019. Management has determined that the current cash balance available to the Company cannot cover the required payments of the operating expenses arising from normal business operations and to meet the required payments of buy-backs and lease-backs if settled with the claims filed by the property owners as disclosed below for the next twelve months from the issuance date of this report. Management cannot provide assurance that the Company will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive or raise additional debt and/ or equity capital. Management believes that its capital resources are not currently adequate to continue operating and maintaining its business for the next twelve months from the issuance date of this report.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company had property financing agreements payable of $75,728,555, lease liabilities payable of $568,421, expired lease-back payables of $5,412,763, and buy-back payables of $4,046,609 . As of September 30, 2019, there were 555 lawsuits against the Company in Dalian City, China. Litigants claimed that the Company did not buy back the property pursuant to the sales contract or the Company did not pay the promised lease-back rent on time. These claims amount to $23,967,091 (RMB 171,206,514 translated at September 30, 2019 exchange rate). These payables were included in and reported under the caption of “Property financing agreements payable”, “Lease liabilities” and “Other payables”. As of September 30, 2019, the Company accrued $4,621,865 for possible extra litigation charges. The Company will record attorney fees when invoiced. The attorney fees in connection with litigation was $4,508 and ($3,264)  for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively; $8,058 and $94,954 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

These lawsuits are caused by our failure of buying back the properties when requested to or our failure of paying rents for certain lease-back units. Subsequently, certain units owned by DVPD have been frozen from transfer or disposition by the courts. DVPD has been restricted from free transfer, disposal, and pledge of its 5% equity interest in DVBM from March 2, 2017 to September 30, 2019. The 5% equity interest in DVBM is still restricted as of the date of this report. In addition, DVPD has be listed as a “dishonest debtor” by the local courts in the PRC. Once listed as a dishonest debtor, DVPD can be subject to certain restrictions in connection with commercial loans at the banks’ discretion; the purchase or transfer of properties and land use rights; and renovation, upgrade or renovation of properties. In addition, the bank accounts of DVPD are frozen by the courts which allow the inflow of cash into the bank accounts but prohibit the outflow of cash.

Management believes that the recorded total property financing agreements payable, guaranteed rent payable, buy-backs payable, certain lease liabilities payable, accrued liabilities for additional payable from litigation, and expired lease-back payables of $90,110,990 is a reasonable estimation. Should the settlement of these liabilities exceed management’s estimates, additional accruals will be necessary.

During 2017, due to lack of effective controls and monitoring procedures and processes, DVPD provided a total of 293 square meters as collateral to help one board member of DVPD, one employee of DVPD (now a former employee) and one unrelated individual to acquire three separate bank working capital loans. There was no gain or profit for the Company to provide such collateral. The one-year period is now past due. The Company has a risk of losing these properties if these individuals are not able to repay these bank loans.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company has spoken with the respective individuals to settle the issue with the Company by either repaying the bank loan or replacing the collateral with their own assets so as to release the Company’s property by December 31, 2019. The Company plans to take legal action against the individuals if they fail to adopt either action by December 31, 2019.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to obtain such resources for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from the sale of its equity securities (2) short-term and long-term borrowings from banks and third-parties, and (3) short-term borrowings from stockholders or other related parties when needed. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

Additionally, even if the Company does raise sufficient capital to support its operations and generates adequate revenues, there can be no assurances that the revenues will be sufficient to enable it to improve to a level where it will generate profits and positive cash flows from operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and or classification of the recorded asset amounts and or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation and consolidation

The accompanying unaudited in interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with according principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements included in the Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements and consist of only normal recurring adjustments, except as disclosed herein. The results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2019.

The Company’s condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of VCM, VCI, Sino Pride, DVPD, DVBM, and DVPM at September 30, 2019 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. All inter-company accounts and transactions among the consolidation group have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Significant estimates include the liabilities recorded for property financing agreements payable, buy-back payables, lease liabilities payable, expired lease-back payables and the estimated liability accrued for additional litigation charges related to the numerous lawsuits. Other estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts on tenant receivables and other receivables, recoverability of long-lived assets, the useful life of rental properties, property and equipment and intangible assets, assumptions used in assessing impairment of long-term assets and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

Foreign Currency Translation

The reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of VCM and VCI is the U.S. dollar, the functional currency of DVPD, DVBM, and DVPM is the Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”), and the functional currency of Sino Pride and DVPM is the Hong Kong Dollar (“HK$”). The condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC 830-30 “Translation of Financial Statements”. The financial information is first prepared in RMB or HK$ and then translated into the U.S. dollar at the period-end exchange rates as to assets and liabilities and at average exchange rates as to revenue, expenses and cash flows. Equity accounts are translated at their historical exchange rates when the capital transactions occurred. As a result, amounts relating to assets and liabilities reported on the statements of cash flows may not necessarily agree with the changes in the corresponding balance sheets. Translation adjustments resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into the U.S. dollar are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cumulative translation adjustment and effect of exchange rate changes on cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018 were $2,221,808 and $(3,739,981), respectively. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate prevailing at each balance sheet date with any transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred.

Pursuant to paragraph 830-20-35-1, the intra-entity (intercompany transactions) foreign currency transactions whose terms are denominated in the currency other than the Company’s functional currency and settlement is anticipated in the foreseeable future (hence not long-term investment nature), the increases or decreases in expected functional currency cash flows are included in determining net income (loss) for the period in which the exchange rate changes. The Company has an inter-company loan denominated in US dollars. The repayment of the loan is required when the Company is profitable. The loan proceeds, repayment and accrued interest were tracked in US dollars. The Company uses the bank spot exchange rate to record proceeds and repayments in RMB. By the end of the reporting period, the Company will adjust loan and interest payable balances from US dollars to RMB by using the period ending exchange rate. Any gain or loss from foreign currency exchange will be recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. There were $894,885 and $863,612 foreign currency transaction losses for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There were $876,527 and $1,242,489 foreign currency transaction losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Spot exchange rates and average exchange rates published by fxtop.com were used in the translation of the consolidated financial statements.

All foreign exchange transactions must take place through authorized institutions of China. Management makes no representation that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at the rates used in translation.

Revenue Recognition

Rental Income

Our Victory Plaza currently has 3,173 rental units. Among these rental properties, the Company owned 433 units, 814 units were sold but with buy-back options, and 1,926 units were sold with no options. The Company will lease back part of these sold properties at the owner’s will and rent out to tenants. As of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company had 3 and 8 lease-back units, respectively. Rental income is reported in the gross amount including rent income from our owned properties and lease-back properties. Existing lease-back expenses were recorded as amortization and interest expenses. Expired lease-back expenses were included in the lease expenses.

The Company recognizes the rental income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. The cumulative differences between rental income recognized in the Company’s condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations and contractual payment terms have been recorded as deferred rental income and presented on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Property Management Fee Income

We currently provide common area management services to all tenants and shop owners. Common area management services include security, cleaning, fire service, landscaping, public facilities maintenance and other traditional services provided by a property management office. The terms of the property management agreements are usually consistent with the tenants’ lease term. Property management fees are charged based on the area of property ranging from $15 to $19 per square foot per annum.

Since the performance obligations in the property management agreements are identical with the terms of property management agreement, the Company recognizes the propriety management income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the management agreement. The cumulative differences between property management income recognized in the Company’s condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations and contractual payment terms have been recorded as deferred income and presented on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Expense Recovery

The Company will pay utility, repair and insurance expenses to third party vendors in order to fulfill its management obligations. The Company will charge all or part of these expenses to tenants in addition to property management fees. The charge methods will depend on the size of tenant and terms of property management agreement. The Company is acting as an agent to arrange for the provision of utilities, repairs and other services by third parties. The Company will recognize the fees collected as income after the Company’s service is provided. The recovered expenses will offset the income the Company is paid and be reported net under the caption of other income in the accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Rental Properties

Rental properties are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Betterments, major renovations and certain costs directly related to the improvements of rental properties are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of the assets. Improvements are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the terms of the respective leases, if any. When rental properties are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations.

The following table summarized the ownership of rental properties.

* In the filing of Form S-1/A dated February 12, 2019, the Company had a C-2 property group category, “Third party has title acquired from previous owner”. The purchase and sale transactions between previous owner and new owner - “third party” will not remove the burden of the Company to buy back the property per the buy-back options. The nature of C-2 group is the same as group B. Therefore, we removed group C-2 (approximately 1%) and combined it with group B above.

Group A represents property that the Company owns. Group B represents property we sold to individual owners with the requirement to be repurchased and options were exercised. Group C represents property owned by SML, but the Company is still liable for the buy-back options. Pursuant to the SML Agreement, the Company is obligated to buy back these properties plus accrued interest no later than May 15, 2020. Group D presents property we sold to various individual owners without additional rights attached.

Sold Rental Properties with Financing Agreements (Group B and C Properties)

Pursuant to the sales contracts, the buyers obtained legal title to the property and also had an option to sign a separate buy-back agreement. The purchase agreement granted the buyer an option to request the Company to buy back sold properties at a stated buy-back price once the option is vested and the Company has received the payments for the sold property. As of September 30, 2019, approximately 16% of total rental spaces of Victory Plaza were sold to various unrelated individuals and entities with buy-back options. The majority of these properties were sold during the period from 1998 to 2014. The vesting dates of the buy-back options ranged from 2014 to 2018. As of September 30, 2019, there are 3 remaining buy back options that can be exercised.

Pursuant to ASC 360-20-40-38, if a property seller has an obligation to repurchase the property, or the terms of the transaction allow the buyer to compel the seller or give an option to request the seller to repurchase the property, the transaction shall be accounted for as a financing, lease, or profit-sharing arrangement rather than as a sale. It is aligned with ASC 842-40-25-3, an option for the seller-lessee to repurchase the asset would preclude accounting for the transfer of the asset as a sale of the asset. The Company’s accounting policy is to treat this type of sale as a financing agreement. The Company continues to report its ownership of the property sold as an asset (within rental properties) and continues to depreciate the property based on the estimated useful lives. The Company recorded sales proceeds as “property financing agreements payable” in the consolidated financial statements and accrues the interest payable during the periods of the vesting. The interest rate is determined by the price spread of each unit’s sale price and buy-back price, and the time span from the date of sale to the maturity date (last date to execute the option). The Company will derecognize the liability when the Company purchases back the properties, or the owners of these properties have settled with the Company or gave up the buy-back options, or upon the expiration of the option if not exercised. If the settlement is greater than the book amount (including principal and interest), a loss will be recognized. If the amount of settlement is less than book amount (including principal and interest), a gain will be recognized. See Note 10, Property Financing Agreement Payable for further information.

Sold Properties (Group D Properties)

As of September 30, 2019, approximately 69% of total space of Victory Plaza was sold and is owned by various unrelated individuals and entities with legal title to the respective properties. Pursuant to the sale contracts, at the date of the sales, buyers obtained integrated legal ownership to the sold properties and assumed the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the property (had the ability to rent and sell the property at-will) while the Company received the payments of the purchase price. These sales are considered final sales.

As part of our operations, the Company may lease back properties from the owners of group D properties and subleases these properties to un-related third parties with new lease terms. Sales and lease-back are two separate business transactions. Lease-back is at the owner’s will and is not a condition of sale. Lease-back could happen immediately after the sale of property or at any time after the sale if the owner of the property is interested in rental services provided by the Company.

Under ASC Topic 842, a sale and lease-back arrangement will be accounted for as a sale if all of the following conditions are met: (i) control of the underlying asset is transferred to the buyer-lessor in accordance with the revenue recognition guidelines in ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (ii) the classification of the sublease is not a finance lease from the perspective of the lessee, or a sales-type lease from the perspective of the lessor, and (iii) there is no repurchase option.

There were 4 outstanding leases that the Company leased back from the owners of group D properties as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. All these lease-back arrangements met the above criteria and have been accounted for as a sale. The allocated net book value and land use rights were derecognized, and a gain or loss was recognized when each of the sales was completed.

Lessee Accounting

We have elected to early adopt ASC Topic 842, the recent accounting update related to leases. ASC 842 requires us to determine whether a contract is a lease or contains a lease at the inception of the contract, considering all relevant facts and circumstances. A contract is a lease or contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration.

A lessee should recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. When measuring assets and liabilities arising from a lease, a lessee should include payments to be made in optional periods only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise its option to extend the lease or not exercise an option to terminate the lease. Similarly, optional payments to purchase the underlying asset should be included in the measurement of lease assets and lease liabilities only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that purchase option.

A lease is classified as a finance lease when the lease meets any of the following criteria: (i) the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (ii) the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (iii) the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (iv) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset, or (v) the underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term. A lease not classified as a finance lease is classified as an operating lease.

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of lease payments to be paid as of lease commencement. Lease payments should be discounted at the rate implicit in the lease or lessee’s incremental borrowing rate. The right-of-use asset is initially measured as: (i) the lease liability determined, (ii) lease payments made to the lessor at or before lease commencement, minus lease incentives received from the lessor, and (iii) initial direct costs incurred by the lessee.

A lessee will measure the lease liability by (a) accreting interest expense on the carrying value of the lease liability using the effective interest rate method, and (b) reducing the carrying value of the lease liability for lease payments made. A lessee will measure the right-of-use asset by amortizing that asset over the lease term. Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis. The right-of-use asset will also be tested for impairment based on the asset impairment rules that apply to property, plant and equipment in ASC Topic 360.

For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying assets not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The Company has made this election and recognized lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Lessor Accounting

The Company currently owns 434 rental units and leased these rental properties to various tenants. Pursuant to ASC 842 – 30, the Company will classify a lease as a sales – type lease if: (i) the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (ii) the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (iii) the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (iv) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset, or (v) the underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term. As of September 30, 2019, none of our leases, as a lessor, met the above criteria to be classified as a sale – type lease.

Pursuant to ASC 842 – 30, when none of the sales-type lease classification criteria are met, a lessor would classify the lease as a direct financing lease when both of the following criteria are met: (i) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments and/or any other third party unrelated to the lessor equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset and (ii) it is probable that the lessor will collect the lease payments plus any amount necessary to satisfy a residual value guarantee. As of September 30, 2019, none of our leases, as a lessor, met the above criteria to be classified as a financing lease.

Pursuant to ASC 842 – 30, a lessor would classify a lease as an operating lease when none of the sales-type or direct financing lease classification criteria are met. As of September 30, 2019, all leases of the Company’s rental properties were classified as operating leases. The Company will maintain the underlying asset and recognizes lease income over the lease term.

Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Investments

Sales of real estate include operating properties and investments in real estate joint ventures. Gains from dispositions are recognized using the full accrual or partial sale methods, provided that the Company has met various criteria relating to the terms of sale and any subsequent involvement. If the criteria for sales recognition or gain recognition are not met because of a form of continuing involvement, the accounting for such transactions is dependent on the nature of the continuing involvement. In certain cases, a sale might not be recognized, and in others all or a portion of the gain might be deferred.

Real Estate Held for Sale

The Company generally considers assets to be held for sale when management believes that a sale is probable within a year. This generally occurs when a sales contract is executed with no substantive contingencies and the prospective buyer has significant funds at risk. Assets that are classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. The Company evaluated its property portfolio and did not identify any properties that would meet the criteria for held for sale as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and demand deposits in accounts maintained with commercial banks within the PRC, Hong Kong and United States. The Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents the required cash deposits by the bank to be used for interest and loan repayments only.

Tenant and Sundry Receivables, net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Tenant receivables are recorded at original invoice amount, less an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents management’s estimate of the amount of probable credit losses, determined by reviewing past due balances and other information. The Company makes judgments as to the collectability of tenant receivables based on historical trends and future expectations. Management estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts and adjusts gross tenant receivables based on their expectation of specific tenant risks and the Company’s tenant receivable aging and collection analysis. Management considers accounts past due on a tenant-by-tenant basis. Based on its review, management has established an allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 of $775,292 and $123,467, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes any incremental costs that are directly attributable to the construction or acquisition of the item of property and equipment. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, while major maintenance and remodeling costs are capitalized if they extend the useful life of the asset. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives.

When properties and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed of, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, primarily rental properties and machinery and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the manner in which an asset is used, or a significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is not recoverable. For long-lived assets to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment loss only if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its estimated undiscounted future cash flows over the anticipated holding period and measures the impairment loss based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values or third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. There were no impairment losses recognized during the three months ended and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

Debt Issuance Costs

Costs related to bank loans payable consist of fees and direct costs incurred in obtaining such financings. These costs are presented as a reduction of bank loans payable and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related loan payable which approximates the effective interest rate method. Such amortization is included in “Interest – loans” in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations, which amounted to $13,682 and $14,208 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively; $41,552 and $38,385 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Per Share Amounts

The Company computes per share amounts in accordance with ASC Topic 260 “Earnings per Share” (EPS) which requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company, if any. This is computed by dividing net earnings by the combination of basic and dilutive common share equivalents. Since the Company is in a net loss position, all common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive and are, therefore, not included in the determination of diluted loss per share. Accordingly, basic and diluted net loss per share are the same. There were no common stock equivalents as of September 30, 2019 and 2018.

Non-Controlling Interest

Non-controlling interest is classified as a separate line item in the deficit section and disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. This amount represents the 20% non-controlling interest in DVPD owned by DVDC.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company follows ASC 220-10, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” ASC 220-10 requires the reporting of comprehensive income (loss) in addition to net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is a more inclusive financial reporting methodology that includes disclosure of information that historically has not been recognized in the calculation of net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) generally represents all changes in shareholders’ equity during the period except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to shareholders. Comprehensive income (loss) reflects the gain (loss) due to foreign currency translation adjustments.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the provision of ASC 825-10-65, “Financial Instruments – Transition and Open Effective Date Information”. Although the estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in current market exchanges. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

Income Taxes

The Company is governed by the Income Tax Law of the PRC, the Special Region of Hong Kong and the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset/liability method prescribed by ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the period in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are also provided for net operating loss carryforwards that can be used to offset taxable income in the future. The Company records a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income or loss in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which provides clarification related to the process associated with accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in the Company’s financial statements. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Company’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the Company’s results of operations for any given quarter or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had no uncertain tax positions, and will continue to evaluate for uncertain positions in the future.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company complies with the provisions of ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure” (ASC 820) in measuring fair value and in disclosing fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. ASC 820-10-35, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Subsequent Measurement (ASC 820-10-35), clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value measurement reflects the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model.

ASC 820-10-35 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1 Inputs – Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for assets or liabilities identical to those to be reported at fair value. An active market is a market in which transactions occur for the item to be fair valued with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 Inputs – Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1. Level 2 inputs are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs include: (a) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (b) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, such as when there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially over time or in which little information is released publicly; (c) Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and (d) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs – Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability. These inputs should be used to determine fair value only when observable inputs are not available. Unobservable inputs should be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include internally generated data and assumptions being used to price the asset or liability.

When determining the fair value measurements for assets or liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at and/or marked to fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets. Nevertheless, certain assets are not actively traded in observable markets and the Company must use alternative valuation techniques to derive a fair value measurement.

Related Parties

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if they, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal with if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions.

Deferred Rental Income

Rental and management fee income from leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant leases. The cumulative difference between the rental income/management fees recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and actual annual contractual lease payments are recorded as deferred rental income and presented on the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, prepaid lease payments from the tenant is recorded within the deferred income.

Advertising

Advertising is expensed as incurred and is included in other general and administrative expenses. There were no advertising expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

We consider the applicability and impact of all Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). The ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact, if any, on our consolidated financial position and/or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which modifies the measurement of expected credit losses on certain financial instruments. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-13 in its first quarter of 2021 utilizing the modified retrospective transition method. The Company is still in the process of determining the impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842 ).” This standard requires entities to recognize assets and liabilities on their balance sheet for the rights (right-of-use or “ROU”) and obligations created by the leased assets. The standard is effective for fiscal years and the interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance is required to be applied by the modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. We have adopted the guidance of this standard effective December 31, 2016 and retrospectively from the beginning of the lease term and recognized ROU assets and obligations created by these leases. As a result, $534,963 and $422,905 of ROU assets, net and leases liabilities of $568,421 and $612,125 were recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which outlines a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes and replaces nearly all existing GAAP revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The authoritative guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The five steps are: (i) identify the contract with the customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognize revenue when or as each performance obligation is satisfied. The authoritative guidance applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB ASC. The authoritative guidance requires significantly expanded disclosures about revenue recognition and was initially effective for fiscal years and the interim periods within these fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): which deferred for one year the effective date until fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The adoption of this authoritative guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provides an additional, optional transition method related to implementing the new leases standard. ASU 2018-11 provides that companies can initially apply the new leases standard at adoption and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Management is evaluating the new guidance and expects to report increased assets and liabilities as a result of recording right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2018-02”). ASU 2018-02 was issued as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) on December 22, 2017. Accounting guidance required deferred tax items to be revalued based on the new tax laws (the most significant of which reduced the corporate tax rate to 21% percent from 34% percent) and to include the change in income (loss) from continuing operations. ASU 2018-02 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Management believes the adoption of ASU No.2018-02 will not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The update changes the classification of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. The update also clarifies existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. The update is effective retrospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for all companies in any interim or annual period. Management believe the adoption of ASU No.2017-11 will not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation: (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This pronouncement was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. We adopted the new standard using the full retrospective application, and the adoption did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures for any period.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). The ASU clarifies the definition of business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 was effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning April 1, 2018 and subsequent interim periods with no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company does not believe other recently issued but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 4 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:

NOTE 5 – RENTAL PROPERTIES, NET

Victory Plaza is located in Dalian City, Liaoning Province of China. It was built by DVPD from 1993 to 1998.

The Company leases its own properties and lease-backed properties to tenants and manages the Victory Plaza.

The following table summarized ownership of rental properties.

As of September 30, 2019

As of December 31, 2018