NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

Organization

Victory Commercial Management Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “VCM”, and where appropriate, the terms “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” are also referred to VCM and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries) was incorporated on July 5, 2017 under the laws of Nevada.

On July 13, 2017, VCM formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Victory Commercial Investment Ltd. (“VCI”) under the laws of British Virgin Islands.

Sino Pride Development Limited (“Sino Pride”) is a Hong Kong company, incorporated on May 26, 1989. Sino Pride is a holding company that directly owns an 80% equity interest in Dalian Victory Plaza Development Co., Ltd. (“DVPD”) and directly owns a 95% equity interest in Dalian Victory Business Management Co., Ltd. (“DVBM”).

DVPD was incorporated as a Sino-foreign cooperative joint venture on March 29, 1993 under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”). Sino Pride owns 80% equity interest of DVPD while Dalian Victory Development Co., Limited (“DVDC”), a state-owned enterprise in China, owns a 20% equity interest in DVPD.

DVBM was incorporated as a joint venture on September 12, 2000 under the laws of the PRC. Sino Pride owns a 95% equity interest in DVBM and DVPD owns a 5% equity interest in DVBM.

Dalian Victory Property Management Co.,Ltd. (“DVPM”) was incorporated on June 6, 2018 as limited liability company under the laws of the PRC. Sino Pride owns 100% of the equity of DVPM. DVPM was formed as a property management company and will play a similar role as DVBM to improve the management of Victory Plaza. DVPM has not commenced operations.

Iven International Group Limited, is a company registered in Hong Kong (“Iven”). From October 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017, Alex Brown beneficially owned 100% of Iven, among which, a 70% equity interest was held directly, and a 30% equity interest was held indirectly through Dalian Yiwen New Materials Technology Development Co., Ltd, a PRC entity 80% owned by Alex Brown and 20% owned by his spouse. On June 30, 2017, Alex Brown and Dalian Yiwen New Material Technology Development Co., Ltd transferred their respective ownership of Iven to Winner Ascent Investment Limited, a Hong Kong limited liability company solely owned by Alex Brown.

Victory Plaza Holding Limited, (“VP Holding”) a BVI company, is the original owner of Sino Pride. VP Holding incurred significant losses from the operations of Sino Pride and its subsidiaries DVPD and DVBM. VP Holding and Sino Pride had no relationship or affiliation with us or Alex Brown prior to the corporate restructuring.

November 30, 2016 Transaction

In November 2016, Iven entered and executed an agreement of “Assignment of Common Stock and Debt Rights” (“the Original Agreement”) with VP Holding, the former shareholder of Sino pride. Pursuant to the Original Agreement, Iven acquired all 30,000,000 shares of common stock of Sino Pride then outstanding and assumed a shareholder loan and loan interest totaling $52,750,000 (Sino Pride owed to VP Holding) for a nominal consideration of HK$ 1 (approximately US$0.13) from VP Holding. Change of ownership in Sino Pride from VP Holding to Iven had no impact on Sino Pride’s ownership in DVPD and DVBM (operating entities).

Iven was a private shell company with no operations and with nominal assets, which is 100% directly and indirectly owned by Mr. Brown. Iven was the legal acquirer in the November 30, 2016 acquisition. At the date of acquisition, Sino Pride was a holding company of two Chinese base operating entities, DVPD and DVBM. The accounting acquirer usually is the combining entity whose relative size (measured in, for example, assets, revenues, or earnings) is significantly larger than that of the other combining entity or entities as per Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 805-10-55-13. Thus, Sino Pride and Subsidiaries were treated as the accounting acquirer in connection with the November 2016 transaction.

The November 2016 transaction was treated as a reverse acquisition or recapitalization. The accounting is similar to that resulting from a reverse acquisition, except that no goodwill or other intangible assets should be recorded. Accordingly, the historical financial statements are those of Sino Pride and its Subsidiaries.

September 4, 2017 Transaction

On September 4, 2017, VCI signed an agreement of “Assignment of All Outstanding Shares and All Debt Rights Agreement” (“the Agreement”) with Iven. Pursuant to the Agreement, VCI acquired all 30,000,000 shares of common stock of Sino Pride then outstanding and assumed shareholder debt and loan rights totaling HK$ 493,807,633 (approximately US$64,208,000) (Sino Pride owed to VP Holding) including an outstanding shareholder loan of HK$ 408,409,628 (approximately US$53,093,000) for a nominal consideration of HK$ 1 (approximately US$0.13) from Iven. The change of ownership in Sino Pride from Iven to VCI had no impact on Sino Pride’s ownership in DVPD and DVBM (operating entities).

Iven and VCI were under common control of our controlling shareholder. The transfer of ownership in Sino Pride from Iven to VCI is a part of the corporate restructuring to prepare the Company to list in the U.S. capital markets.

The Company accounted for the September 2017 transaction as a transaction between entities under common control based on guidance provided by FASB ASC 805-50-25. Following the above transactions, VCI gained control over Sino Pride and its subsidiaries, and, as a result, VCM gained control over VCI, Sino Pride and its Subsidiaries.

The Company together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, VCI, Sino Pride and majority owned subsidiaries, DVBM and DVPM were effectively controlled by the same shareholder, Mr. Brown before and after the September 2017 corporate restructuring, and is considered under common control, which has been accounted for similar to the pooling method of accounting. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the current corporate structure had been in existence at the beginning of the periods presented. Accordingly, the historical financial statements are those of Sino Pride and its Subsidiaries.

Segment Information

The Company and its subsidiaries generate most of the income from rental and building management services. The Company manages one shopping center currently. Geographically, all income is generated from Dalian, China.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As indicated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss of $11,114,921 and $4,748,769 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively; an accumulated deficit of $203,808,349 at December 31, 2019. The Company has an unrestricted cash balance of $122,884 as of December 31, 2019. The Company believes that if there is no additional investment or financing, the current cash balance available to the Company or its projected cash balance for the next 18 months will be very difficult to cover the required payments of the operating expenses arising from normal business operations and to meet the required payments of buy-backs and lease-backs if settled with the claims filed by the property owners during next 18 months from the issuance date of this report.

In light of our current operating state, management cannot provide assurance that the Company will achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive in a short period of time. Management believes that with its current capital resources, it will be very difficult to continue operating and maintaining its business for the next 18 months from the issuance date of this report.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a total of $67,257,262 outstanding loans payable to Harbin Bank (the “Bank”). As of the date of this report, we are in default of three loans with the Bank in the aggregate amount of approximately $53.1 million. These loans are secured by certain assets of the Company. The Company is currently in discussion with the Bank to convert the existing loans into a new loan and apply an additional liquidity loan in RMB 50 million (collectively, the “Refinancing Loans”) and waive the penalty of late payment of related loan interest. However, there is no assurance or certainty that such Refinancing Loans or Penalty Waiver will be approved by the Bank. In the event that the Bank rejects our Refinancing Loans and/or commence any legal proceeding against us regarding the Short-term Loans, we may lose our collateralized assets which will cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, if the collateral on those loans cannot satisfy our payment obligation, we may be forced to commence liquidation process if we do not have sufficient liquidity or cannot raise sufficient fund at that time, if any at all.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had property financing agreements payable of $77,464,781, lease liabilities payable of $521,264, expired lease-back payables of $5,529,680, and buy-back payables of $4,152,344. As of December 31, 2019, there were 565    lawsuits case against the Company in Dalian City, China. Litigants claimed that the Company failed to buy back the property pursuant to the sales contracts or the Company failed to pay the promised lease-back rent on time. As of December 31, 2019, such claims amounted to $24,820,625. These payables were included in and reported under the caption of “Property financing agreements payable”, “Lease liabilities payable” and “Other payables”

These lawsuits are mostly caused by the failure of DVPD   who fails to buy back the properties when requested to or to pay rents for certain lease-back stores. Subsequently, certain stores owned by DVPD have been frozen from transfer or disposition by the courts. DVPD has been prohibited from free transfer, disposal, and pledge of its equity interest in DVBM which accounts for 5% in DVBM from March 2, 2017 to March 1, 2019. The 5% equity interest in DVBM is still restricted currently as of the issuing date of this report. In addition, DVPD has been listed as a “dishonest debtor” by the local courts in the PRC. Once listed as a dishonest debtor, DVPD can be subject to certain restrictions in connection with commercial loans at the banks’ discretion; the purchase or transfer of properties and land use rights; and upgrade or renovation of properties. In addition, the bank accounts of DVPD are frozen by the courts which allow the inflow of cash to its bank accounts but prohibit the outflow of cash. The Company has been working actively to resolve these lawsuits since we acquired Sino Pride in November 2016. However, the company cannot guarantee that all litigation cases can be solved in the future or no new litigation cases will be generated.

Management believes that the recorded total property financing agreements payable, buy-backs payable, lease-back liabilities payable and expired lease payable liabilities of $92,410,701 is a reasonable estimation.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, an additional capital injection and/or additional financing and the continued forbearance of its lender not to foreclose on their loans that are in default. Management’s plans to obtain such fund for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from the sale of its stock (2) short-term and long-term borrowings from banks and third-parties, and (3) short-term borrowings from stockholders or other related parties when needed.

As  of the date of this Annual Report, the Short-Terms Loans have become due while the Company has not made the corresponding payment. The Bank has not taken legal action against the Company and the Bank and the Company are currently discussing potential grant to convert the principal and interests due into a new loan and an additional liquidity loans in an amount of RMB 50 million (collectively, the “Refinancing Loans”). In addition, the Company has been negotiating with the Bank for a waiver of the penalty for late payment of related loan interest (the “Penalty Waiver”). The Company has already submitted the application for the Refinancing Loans at the request of the Bank. It usually takes about 2 to 3 months for the Bank to review and approve the Refinancing Loans and the Penalty Waiver which can be potentially longer as a result of the outbreak of the COVID-19. However, there is no assurance or certainty that such Refinancing Loans or Penalty Waiver will be approved by the Bank. In the event that the Bank rejects our Refinancing Loans and/or commence any legal proceeding against us regarding the Short-term Loans, we may lose our collateralized assets which will cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, if the collateral on those loans cannot satisfy our payment obligation, we may be forced to commence liquidation process if we do not have sufficient liquidity or cannot raise sufficient fund at that time, if any at all.

As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, our DVPD operations in Dalian remained closed from January 25, 2020 until March 5, 2020, which has adversely affected our operating revenues and cash flow in the first quarter of 2020. Moreover, after reopening of the shopping mall, we have much less shoppers and tenants in the shopping mall due to the continued effect of COVID-19, We cannot predict the full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will impact our business or operating results, which is highly dependent on inherently uncertain future developments, including the severity of COVID-19 and the actions taken by governments and private businesses in relation to COVID-19 containment. Additionally, even if the Company does raise sufficient capital to support its operations and generates adequate revenues, there can be no assurances that the revenue will be sufficient to a level where it will generate profits and positive cash flows from operations.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and or classification of the recorded asset amounts and or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements present the historical results of operations and cash flows of VCM and its subsidiaries.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of VCM, VCI, Sino Pride, DVPD, DVBM, and DVPM. All inter-company accounts and transactions among the consolidation group have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to current year’s presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Significant estimates include the liabilities recorded for financial agreements payable, buy-backs payable, lease back liabilities payable, expired lease payables and the estimated liability accrued for additional litigation charges related to the numerous lawsuits. Other estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts on tenant receivables and other receivables, recoverability of long-lived assets, the useful life of rental properties, property and equipment and intangible assets, assumptions used in assessing impairment of long-term assets and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

Foreign Currency Translation

The reporting currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of VCM and VCI is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of DVPD, DVBM, and DVPM is the Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”) whereas the functional currency of Sino Pride and DVPM is the Hong Kong Dollar (“HK$”). The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with FASB ASC 830-30 “Translation of Financial Statements”. The financial information is first prepared in RMB or HK$ and then is translated into the U.S. dollar at the period-end exchange rates as to assets and liabilities and at average exchange rates as to revenue, expenses and cash flows. Equity accounts are translated at their historical exchange rates when the capital transactions occurred. As a result, amounts relating to assets and liabilities reported on the statements of cash flows may not necessarily agree with the changes in the corresponding balance sheets. Translation adjustments resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into the U.S. dollar are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cumulative translation adjustment and effect of exchange rate changes on cash for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $(2,242,729) and $(3,739,981), respectively. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate prevailing at each balance sheet date with any transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred.

Pursuant to paragraph FASB ASC 830-20-35-1, the intra-entity (intercompany transactions) foreign currency transactions whose terms are denominated in the currency other than the Company’s functional currency and settlement is anticipated in the foreseeable future (hence not long-term investment nature), the increases or decreases in expected functional currency cash flows are included in determining net income (loss) for the period in which the exchange rate changes. The Company has an inter-company loan denominated in US dollars. The repayment of the loan is required when the Company is profitable. The loan proceeds, repayment and accrued interest were tracked in US dollars. The Company uses the bank spot exchange rate to record proceeds and repayments in RMB. By the end of the reporting period, the Company will adjust loan and interest payable balances from US dollars to RMB by using the period ending exchange rate. Any gain or loss from foreign currency exchange will be recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. There were $271,447 and $1,220,769 foreign currency transaction losses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Spot exchange rates and average exchange rates published by fxtop.com were used in the translation of the consolidated financial statements.

All foreign exchange transactions must take place through authorized institutions of China. Management makes no representation that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at the rates used in translation.

Revenue Recognition

Rental Income-

Our Victory Plaza currently has 3,173 rental units. Among these rental properties, the Company owned 433 units, 814 units were sold but with buy-back options, and 1,926 units were sold with no repurchase options. The Company will lease back some of these sold properties and rent them out to tenants. All contracts include a lease and contain information on rental income and payment term. Rental income is reported in the gross amount including rent income from our owned properties and lease-back properties. A predominately majority of the rental income comes from our owned properties and a very limited portion, estimated at less than 3%, from the lease-back properties. Existing lease-back expenses were recorded as amortization and interest expenses. Expired lease-back expenses were included in the lease-back expenses.

The Company recognizes the rental income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. The cumulative differences between rental income recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and contractual payment terms have been recorded as deferred rental income and presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Property Management Fee Income

We currently provide common area management services to all tenants and shop owners. Common area management services include security, cleaning, fire service, landscaping, public facilities maintenance and other traditional services provided by a property management office. The terms of the property management agreements are usually consistent with the tenants’ lease term. Property management fees are charged based on the area of property ranging from $16 to $20 per square foot per annum.

Since the performance obligations in the property management agreement are identical with the terms of property management agreement, the Company recognizes the propriety management income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the management agreement. The cumulative differences between property management income recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and contractual payment terms have been recorded as deferred income and presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Expense Recovery

The Company will pay utility, repair and insurance expenses to third party vendors in order to fulfill its management obligations. The Company will charge all or part of these expenses to tenants in addition to property management fees. The charge will depend on the size of tenant and terms of property management agreement. The Company is acting as an agent to arrange for the provision of utilities, repairs and other services by third parties. The Company will recognize the fees collected as income after the Company’s service is provided. The recovered expenses will offset the income the Company is paid and be reported net under the caption of other income in accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Rental Properties

Rental properties are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Betterments, major renovations and certain costs directly related to the improvements of rental properties are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of the assets. Improvements are capitalized and amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the terms of the respective leases, if any. When rental properties are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations.

The following table summarized the ownership of rental properties.

* In the filing of Form S-1/A dated February 12, 2019, the Company had a C-2 property group category, “Third party has title acquired from previous owner”. The purchase and sale transactions between the previous owner and new owner - “third party” will not remove the burden of the Company to buy back the property per the buy-back options. The nature of C-2 group is the same as Group B. Therefore, we removed group C-2 (approximately 1%) and combined it with Group B.

Group A represents property that the Company owns 100%. Group B represents property we sold to individual owners with buy-back options which are pending. Group C represents property owned by SML, but the Company is still liable for the buy-back options. Pursuant to the SML Agreement, the Company is obligated to buy back these properties plus accrued interest no later than May 15, 2020. Group D presents property we sold to various individual owners without additional rights attached.

Sold Rental Properties with Financing Agreements (Group B and C Properties)

Pursuant to the sales contracts, the buyers’ obtained legal title to the property and also had an option to sign a separate buy-back agreement. The purchase agreement granted the buyer an option to request the Company to buy back sold properties at a stated buy-back price once the option vested and the Company has received the payments for the sold property. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 15% of total rental spaces of Victory Plaza were sold to various unrelated individuals and entities with buy-back options. The majority of these properties were sold during the period from 1998 to 2014. The vesting dates of the buy-back options ranged from 2014 to 2018.

Pursuant to FASB ASC 360-20-40-38, if a property seller has an obligation to repurchase the property, or the terms of the transaction allow the buyer to compel the seller or give an option to request the seller to repurchase the property, the transaction shall be accounted for as financing, lease, or profit-sharing arrangement rather than as a sale. It is aligned with FASB ASC 842-40-25-3, an option for the seller-lessee to repurchase the asset would preclude accounting for the transfer of the asset as a sale of the asset. The Company’s accounting policy is to treat this type of sales as a financing agreement. The Company continues to report its ownership of the property sold as an asset (within Rental Properties) and continues to depreciate the property based on the estimated useful lives. The Company recorded sales proceeds as “property financing agreements payable” in the consolidated financial statements and accrues the interest payable during the periods of the vesting. The interest rate is determined by the price spread of each unit’s sale price and buy-back price, and the time span from the date of sale to the maturity date (last date to execute the option). The Company will derecognize the liability when the Company purchases back the properties, or the owners of these properties have settled with the Company or gave up the buy-back options, or upon the expiration of the option if not exercised. If the settlement is greater than the book amount (including principal and interest), a loss will be recognized. If the amount of settlement is less than book amount (including principal and interest), a gain will be recognized. See Note 10, Property Financing Agreement Payable for further information.

Sold Properties (Group D Properties)

As of December 31, 2019, approximately 69% of the total space of Victory Plaza was sold and owned by various unrelated individuals and entities with legal title to the respective properties. Pursuant to the sale contracts, at the date of the sales, buyers obtained integrated legal ownership to the sold properties and assumed the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the property (had the ability to rent and sell the property at-will) while the Company received the payments of the purchase price. These sales are considered final sales.

As part of our operations, the Company may from time to from lease back properties from the owners of Group D properties and subleases these properties to un-related third parties with new lease terms. As of December 31, 2019, there was no sublease from the owner of Group D properties. Sales and lease-back are two separate business transactions. Lease-back is at the owner’s will and is not a condition of sale. Lease-back could happen immediately after the sale of property or at any time after the sale if the owner of the property is interested in rental services provided by the Company.

Under FASB ASC Topic 842, a sale and lease-back arrangement will be accounted for as a sale if all of the following conditions are met: (i) control of the underlying asset is transferred to the buyer-lessor in accordance with the revenue recognition guidelines in FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (ii) the classification of the sublease is not a finance lease from the perspective of the lessee, or a sales-type lease from the perspective of the lessor, and (iii) there is no repurchase option.

There were 2 and 4 outstanding leases that the Company leased back from the owners of Group D properties as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. All these lease-back arrangements met the above criteria and have been accounted for as a sale. The allocated net book value and land use rights were derecognized, and a gain or loss was recognized when each of the sales was completed.

Lessee Accounting

We have elected to early adopt FASB ASC Topic 842, the recent accounting update related to leases. FASB ASC 842 requires us to determine whether a contract is a lease or contains a lease at the inception of the contract, considering all relevant facts and circumstances. A contract is a lease or contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration.

A lessee should recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. When measuring assets and liabilities arising from a lease, a lessee should include payments to be made in optional periods only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise its option to extend the lease or not exercise an option to terminate the lease. Similarly, optional payments to purchase the underlying asset should be included in the measurement of lease assets and lease liabilities only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that purchase option.

A lease is classified as a finance lease when the lease meets any of the following criteria: (i) the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (ii) the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (iii) the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (iv) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset, or (v) the underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term. A lease not classified as a finance lease is classified as an operating lease.

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of lease payments to be paid as of lease commencement. Lease payments should be discounted at the rate implicit in the lease or lessee’s incremental borrowing rate. The right-of-use asset is initially measured as: (i) the lease liability determined, (ii) lease payments made to the lessor at or before lease commencement, minus lease incentives received from the lessor, and (iii) initial direct costs incurred by the lessee.

A lessee will measure the lease liability by (a) accreting interest expense on the carrying value of the lease liability using the effective interest rate method, and (b) reducing the carrying value of the lease liability for lease payments made. A lessee will measure the right-of-use asset by amortizing that asset over the lease term. Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis. The right-of-use asset will also be tested for impairment based on the asset impairment rules that apply to property, plant and equipment in FASB ASC Topic 360.

For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying assets not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it should recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Lessor Accounting

The Company currently owns 433 rental units and leased these rental properties to various tenants. Pursuant to FASB ASC 842 – 30, the Company will classify a lease as a sales – type lease if: (i) the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (ii) the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (iii) the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (iv) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset, or (v) the underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term. As of December 31, 2019, none of our leases, as a lessor, met the above criteria to be classified as a sales–type lease.

Pursuant to FASB ASC 842 – 30, when none of the sales-type lease classification criteria are met, a lessor would classify the lease as a direct financing lease when both of the following criteria are met: (i) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments and/or any other third party unrelated to the lessor equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset and (ii) it is probable that the lessor will collect the lease payments plus any amount necessary to satisfy a residual value guarantee. As of December 31, 2019, none of our leases, as a lessor, met the above criteria to be classified as a financing lease.

Pursuant to FASB ASC 842 – 30, a lessor would classify a lease as an operating lease when none of the sales-type lease or direct financing lease classification criteria are met. As of December 31, 2019, all leases of the Company’s rental properties were classified as operating leases. The Company will maintain the underlying asset and recognizes lease income over the lease term.

Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Investments

Sales of real estate include operating properties and investments in real estate joint ventures. Gains from dispositions are recognized using the full accrual or partial sale methods, provided that the Company has met various criteria relating to the terms of sale and any subsequent involvement. If the criteria for sales recognition or gain recognition are not met because of a form of continuing involvement, the accounting for such transactions is dependent on the nature of the continuing involvement. In certain cases, a sale might not be recognized, and in others all or a portion of the gain might be deferred.

Real Estate Held for Sale

The Company generally considers assets to be held for sale when management believes that a sale is probable within a year. This generally occurs when a sales contract is executed with no substantive contingencies and the prospective buyer has significant funds at risk. Assets that are classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. The Company evaluated its property portfolio and did not identify any properties that would meet the criteria for held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and demand deposits in accounts maintained with commercial banks within the PRC, Hong Kong and United States. The Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents cash deposits required by the bank to be used for interest and loan repayments only.

Tenant and Sundry Receivables, net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Tenant receivables are recorded at original invoice amount, less an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents management’s estimate of the amount of probable credit losses, determined by reviewing past due balances and other information. The Company makes judgments as to the collectability of tenant receivables based on historical trends and future expectations. Management estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts and adjusts gross tenant receivables downward based on their expectation of specific tenant risks and the Company’s tenant receivable aging and collection analysis. Management considers accounts past due on a tenant-by-tenant basis. Based on its review, management has provided an allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 of $632,768 and $123,467, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes any incremental costs that are directly attributable to the construction or acquisition of the item of property and equipment. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, while major maintenance and remodeling costs are capitalized if they extend the useful life of the asset. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives.

When properties and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed of, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of operations.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, primarily rental properties and machinery and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the manner in which an asset is used, or a significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is not recoverable. For long-lived assets to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment loss only if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its estimated undiscounted future cash flows over the anticipated holding period and measures the impairment loss based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values or third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. There were no impairment losses recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Debt Issuance Costs

Costs related to bank loans payable consist of fees and direct costs incurred in obtaining such financings. These costs are presented as a reduction of bank loans payable and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related loan payable which approximates the effective interest rate method. Such amortization is included in “Interest – loans” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, which amounted to $55,190 and $52,331 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Per Share Amounts

The Company computes per share amounts in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260 “Earnings per Share” (EPS) which requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company, if any. This is computed by dividing net earnings by the combination of basic and dilutive common share equivalents. Since the Company is in a net loss position, all common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive and are, therefore, not included in the determination of diluted loss per share. Accordingly, basic and diluted net loss per share are the same. There were no common stock equivalents as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Non-Controlling Interest

Non-controlling interest is classified as a separate line item in the equity section and disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. This amount represents the 20% non-controlling interest in DVPD owned by DVDC.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company follows ASC 220-10, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” FASB ASC 220-10 requires the reporting of comprehensive income (loss) in addition to net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is a more inclusive financial reporting methodology that includes disclosure of information that historically has not been recognized in the calculation of net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) generally represents all changes in shareholders’ equity during the period except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to shareholders. Comprehensive income (loss) reflects the gain (loss) due to foreign currency translation adjustments.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the provision of FASB ASC 825-10-65, “Financial Instruments – Transition and Open Effective Date Information”. Although the estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in current market exchanges. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

Income Taxes

The Company is governed by the Income Tax Law of the PRC, the Special Region of Hong Kong and the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset/liability method prescribed by FASB ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the period in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are also provided for net operating loss carryforwards that can be used to offset taxable income in the future. The Company records a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income or loss in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which provides clarification related to the process associated with accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in the Company’s financial statements. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Company’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the Company’s results of operations for any given quarter or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Company had no uncertain tax positions, and will continue to evaluate for uncertain positions in the future.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company complies with the provisions of FASB ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure “(ASC 820) in measuring fair value and in disclosing fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. FASB ASC 820-10-35, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Subsequent Measurement (ASC 820-10-35), clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value measurement reflects the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model.

ASC 820-10-35 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1 Inputs – Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for assets or liabilities identical to those to be reported at fair value. An active market is a market in which transactions occur for the item to be fair valued with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 Inputs – Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1. Level 2 inputs are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs include: (a) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (b) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, such as when there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially over time or in which little information is released publicly; (c) Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and (d) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs – Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for an asset or liability. These inputs should be used to determine fair value only when observable inputs are not available. Unobservable inputs should be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include internally generated data and assumptions being used to price the asset or liability.

When determining the fair value measurements for assets or liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at and/or marked to fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets. Nevertheless, certain assets are not actively traded in observable markets and the Company must use alternative valuation techniques to derive a fair value measurement.

Related Parties

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if they, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal with if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions.

Deferred Rental Income

Rental and management fee income from leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant leases. The cumulative difference between the rental income/management fees recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and actual annual contractual lease payments are recorded as deferred rental income and presented on the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, prepaid lease payments from the tenant is included in deferred income.

Advertising

Advertising is expensed as incurred and is included in other general and administrative expenses. There were $472 and $680 advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this Update affect any entity that is required to apply the provisions of Topic 220, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income, and has items of other comprehensive income for which the related tax effects are presented in other comprehensive income as required by GAAP. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this Update is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, (1) for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) for all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this Update should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees, which nonemployee share-based payment awards within the scope of Topic 718 are measured at grant-date fair value of the equity instruments that an entity is obligated to issue when the goods have been delivered or the service has been rendered and any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied. The definition of the term grant date is amended to generally state the date at which a grantor and a grantee reach a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of a share based payment award. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement” (“ASU 2018-13”). ASU 2018-13 removes, modifies and adds certain disclosure requirements in Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurement”. ASU 2018-13 eliminates certain disclosures related to transfers and the valuations process, modifies disclosures for investments that are valued based on net asset value, clarifies the measurement uncertainty disclosure, and requires additional disclosures for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting periods beginning July 1, 2020. The Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, which is an update to ASU Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which introduced the expected credit losses methodology for the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost basis, replacing the previous incurred loss methodology. The amendments in Update 2016-13 added Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, and made several consequential amendments to the Codification. Update 2016-13 also modified the accounting for available-for-sale debt securities, which must be individually assessed for credit losses when fair value is less than the amortized cost basis, in accordance with Subtopic 326-30, Financial Instruments— Credit Losses—Available-for-Sale Debt Securities. The amendments in this Update address those stakeholders’ concerns by providing an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost basis. For those entities, the targeted transition relief will increase comparability of financial statement information by providing an option to align measurement methodologies for similar financial assets. Furthermore, the targeted transition relief also may reduce the costs for some entities to comply with the amendments in Update 2016-13 while still providing financial statement users with decision-useful information. ASU 2019-05 is effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting periods beginning July 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2019-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

The Company does not believe other recently issued but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 4 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:

NOTE 5 – RENTAL PROPERTIES, NET

Victory Plaza is located in Dalian City, Liaoning Province of China. It was built by DVPD from 1993 to 1998.

The Company leases its own properties and lease-backed properties to tenants and manages the Victory Plaza.

The following table summarized ownership of rental properties.

As of December 31, 2019

As of December 31, 2018

*See Note 10, Property Financing Agreement Payable

Depreciation  expense for the rental properties was $920,943 and $974,548 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, 1,023,519 square feet (95,088 square meters) of total rental properties (Group D property), or 69% of rental properties were sold. These sold properties are owned by various unrelated individuals and entities. The majority of these properties were sold during the period from 1998 to 2012. Pursuant to the sale contracts, at the date of the sale, buyers obtained legal ownership to the sold properties and assumed the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the property (had the ability to rent and sell the property at-will) while the Company received the payments of the purchase prices. These sales were considered final sales. The allocated carrying cost and land use rights costs were derecognized and gains or losses were recognized when the sales were completed.

As of December 31, 2019, DVPD owned 240,455 Square feet (22,339 square meters) of total rental properties (Group A property) (approximately 16%) with legal title. As of December 31, 2018, DVPD owned 240,799 square feet (22,371 square meters) of total rental properties (Group A property) (approximately 16%) with legal title. Rental properties are carried at cost, which includes allocated construction costs and allocated original purchased land use right costs. These properties were recorded under the caption of “rental properties”.

Among the properties owned by the Company, 200,747 square feet (18,650 square meters) of properties were used as collateral for a 390M RMB Loan ($56.2 million) and 22,098 square feet (2,053 square meters) were used as collateral for 50M RMB Loan ($7.2 million) and 23M RMB Loan ($3.5 million). (see Note 10, Bank Loans Payable)

Group B and Group C properties were properties sold to various unrelated individuals and entities with a buy-back option. The majority of these properties were sold during the period from 1998 to 2012. The vesting dates of the buy-back options ranged from 2014 to 2018. The Company has no legal title to these properties until the Company purchases back these properties upon the exercise of the buy-back option. The Company’s accounting policy is to treat these types of sales as a financing agreement. The cost of property sold has been measured under the caption of “rental property” in the consolidated financial statements and continue to be depreciated. The Company recorded the sales proceeds as “property financing agreements payable” in the consolidated financial statements and accrues the interest expense during the period of the lease. The interest rate is determined by the price spread of each unit’s sale price and re-purchase price, and the time span from the date of sale to the maturity date (last date to execute the option). At the date of repurchase, the amount of sales proceeds received plus interest accrued will be equal to the agreed purchase price. The Company will derecognize the liability at the earlier of (1) when the Company repurchases the property, (2) when the owner of the property and the Company reaches a settlement and the owner gives up the buy-back option, or (3) the expiration of the buy-back option. (See Note 10), Property Financing Agreement Payable for further information.

In the filing of Form S-1/A dated February 12, 2019, the Company had a C-2 property group category, “Third party has title acquired from previous owner”. The purchase and sale transactions between the previous owner and new owner - “third party” will not remove the burden of the Company to buy back the property per the buy-back option. The nature of the C-2 group was the same as Group B. Therefore, we removed group C-2 and combined it (approximately 1%), with Group B.

As of December 31, 2019, Group B properties had 130,394 square feet (12,114 square meters) 9% of total properties. As of December 31, 2018, Group B properties had 130,049 square feet (12,082 square meters) 9% of total properties.

Pursuant to the SML financing agreement (see Note 10, Property Financing Agreement Payable), SML will negotiate with each individual property owner who exercised their option to request the Company to buy back the property on a case by case basis and pay an agreed upon price to the property owner. SML will acquire the title to the property and settle with the previous owner and extend the buy-back option to May 15, 2020. The Company will honor the buy-back agreements and agreed to pay the same purchase price stated in the original buy-back agreements. SML will also negotiate with lease back owners and settle the balance due that the Company owed to lease owners. The Company will pay interest at 8% per annum of the balance (buy-back price) owed to SML. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, 86,251 square feet (8,013 square meters) of properties were owned by SML.

There is no private ownership of land in the PRC. All land in the PRC is owned by the government and cannot be sold to any individual or company. The government grants a land use right that permits the holder of the land a right to use the land for a specified period. Our land use rights were granted with a term of 50 years. Any transfer of the land use right requires government approval. The acquisition cost of the land use right was allocated to each rental property and is amortized with the rental property. The land use rights expire in May 2043. Properties’ estimated life was determined by the valid life of land use rights. Rental properties are depreciated over 45 years.

Expected future minimum rents to be received over the next five years and thereafter from leases in effect as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:

During 2019, the Company didn’t sell any unit. During 2018, the Company sold 26 units comprised of 7,460 square feet (693 square meters) to third parties without buy-back options. Those sales were considered as final. The Company realized a gain of $1,340,035 from these sales.

NOTE 6 –PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are composed of the following:

Depreciation expense was $222,813 and $226,603 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

NOTE 7 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist of the software used in management. The cost and related amortization are as follows:

Amortization expense was $5,201 and $3,171 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

NOTE 8 – RIGHT OF USE ASSETS

As part of its operations, the Company leases back sold properties in Victory Plaza and subleases the properties to un-related third parties with separate lease terms. Leases related to the property in Group B (see Note 5, Rental Properties, Net) which were sold with buy-back options are classified as financing leases. Leases related to the property in Group D (see Note 5) are classified as financing leases if the lease meets any of the following criteria: (i) the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (ii) the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (iii) The lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (iv) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset, or (v) the underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term. A lease will be classified as an operating lease if it is not classified as a finance lease.

On March 27, 2018, Sino Pride leased office space which is to expire on March 26, 2020. Due to the cost consideration, on August 15, 2019, Sino Pride terminated its old lease and moved to a new location. The lease is classified as an operating lease. At the lease commencement date, the Company recognized a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, which is the present value of the total lease payments discounted at 5.25% - a premium bank lending rate per annum at the date. The right-of-use asset is amortized over the term of lease.

Right of use assets consist of the followings as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

There were 6 and 15 lease-back leases that expired during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company did not renew those leases.

Amortization of ROU assets were $38,040 and $110,602 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Operating lease expense was $291,549 and $235,623 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The short-term rent lease expense was also included in operating lease expense. In addition to the above operating lease expense, short-term rental expense was $307,505 and $268,778 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

NOTE 9 - SHORT-TERM LOAN AND INTEREST RECEIVABLE

On June 28, 2018, DVBM entered into a loan agreement to lend RMB 50,000,000 or $7,265,647 (the “Principal”) to Zhong Ke Chuang Zhan Investment, Ltd, an independent third party (“ZKCZ”). The maturity date of the unsecured loan was June 30, 2019 (the “Maturity Date”). The interest (the “Interest”) shall accrue on the unpaid Principal amount of the loan from July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018 at a simple rate of 2% per month and from October 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 at a simple rate of 0.7% per month. All computations of the Interest rate hereunder shall be made based on the daily balance of the Principal amount of the loan. Accrued, but unpaid, interest shall be paid on the Maturity Date. The outstanding loan principle to ZKCZ was approximately $7.5 million at December 31, 2019.

On June 30, 2019, the Company signed a new loan agreement with ZKCZ to amend the loan amount from $7,182,360 (RMB 50,000,000) to $10,773,540 (RMB 75,000,000) and extend its Maturity Date to September 30, 2020. At the request of the Company, ZKCZ has provided to the Company a Promissory Note and payment plan related to the above outstanding loan. As of June 30, 2019, the Company has recorded a reserve allowance of $2,606,349 (RMB 18,144,100) in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. From  January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020, ZKCZ has made payments of approximately RMB 6.2M back to the Company. 

NOTE 10 – BANK LOANS PAYABLE

The following table sets forth the Company’s loans payable as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

On July 20, 2014, the Company’s subsidiaries, DVPD entered into a 10-year loan agreement (the “RMB 390M Loan”) US$56,022,409 (RMB 390,000,000 translated at December 31, 2019 exchange rate) long-term borrowing from Harbin Bank (the “Bank”). The Loan was used for “repayment of other bank loans, repayment of shareholder loans and renovations”. The Loan charges a floating rate of interest at 120% of the loan rate published by the People’s Bank of China for similar loans. Current benchmark rate for a business loan over 5 years is 4.9% per annum adjusted on October 24, 2015. The average interest rates were 5.88% and 5.90% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Originally, Loan was to mature on June 19, 2024. On August 17, 2017, the Bank agreed to the following: (i) to extend the maturity date of the Loan from July 19, 2024 to July 18, 2027; (ii) to extend the initial monthly repayment date from August 20, 2017 to July 20, 2020, however, during the extended period, the Company has to repay principal of US$72,015 (RMB 500,000) per quarter plus monthly interest; and (iii) add Mr. Alex Brown, the controlling shareholder and founder of VCI, as a joint and several guarantor. The Loan agreement includes customary events of default, including DVPD’s failure to pay any principal or interest when due, becoming insolvent, or ceasing operations, or if there is a material adverse change in the assets, business, commitments, or prospects of DVPD. Upon the Bank’s declaration of an event of default under the Loan agreement, they can demand payment in full of all outstanding principal and accrued interest. The RMB 390M Loan balance was US$55,519,644 (RMB 386,500,000) and US$56,267,993 (RMB 387,000,000) as of December 31, 2019 and, 2018, respectively.

The Loan is secured substantially by 18,650 square meters (200,747 square feet) of rental properties owned by DVPD and guaranteed jointly by Sino Pride, DVPD, DVBM, and Mr. Alex Brown. If DVPD fails to fulfill the obligations of the relevant provisions of the RMB 390M Loan agreement, each guarantor shall be liable and pay liquidated damages to the Bank. The damages are 20% of the principal amount of the loan.

According to the loan agreement with the Bank dated August 17, 2017, the Company had paid to the Bank the quarterly principal plus monthly interest through the first quarter of 2019. The Company, however, has not made such payment since April 2019, which can be considered as an event of default. As of December 31, 2019, accrued principal and interest totaled approximately $2.7 million (the “RMB 390M Loan Balance Due”).

On March 24, 2015, DVPD entered into a loan agreement (the “RMB 50M Loan”) for a US$7,182,360 (RMB50,000,000 translated at December 31, 2019 exchange rate) long-term borrowing from the Bank. The RMB 50M Loan was used for renovations. The RMB 50M Loan charges a floating rate of interest at 120% of the loan rate published by the People’s Bank of China. The current benchmark rate for a business loan over 5 years is 4.9% per annum adjusted on October 24, 2015. The average interest rates for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were 5.89% and 5.88%, respectively. The maturity date of the RMB 50M Loan is July 19, 2024. The RMB 50M Loan Agreement includes customary events of default, including DVPD’s failure to pay any principal or interest when due, becoming insolvent, or ceasing operations, or if there is a material adverse change in the assets, business, commitments, or prospects of DVPD. Upon the Bank’s declaration of an event of default under the loan agreement, the Bank Loan can demand payment in full of all outstanding principal and accrued interest. The RMB 50M Loan balance was US$4,104,206 (RMB 28,571,429) and US$4,348,878 (RMB 29,910,714) at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The RMB 50M Loan is secured substantially by 2,053 square meters (22,098 square feet) of rental properties owned by DVPD and guaranteed jointly by Sino Pride, DVPD and DVBM. If DVPD fails to fulfill the obligations of the relevant provisions of the Loan agreement, each guarantor shall be liable and pay liquidated damages to the Bank. The damages are 20% of the principal amount of the loan. The Company is required to make the principal and interest payments from April 20, 2015 through the Maturity Date.

As of December 31, 2019, the accrued principal and interest totaled approximately $0.8 million (the “RMB 50M Loan Balance Due”).

On December 21, 2017, DVPD entered into a liquidity loan agreement (the “RMB 23M Loan”) for a principal amount of $3,534,383 (RMB 23,000,000) from Harbin Bank (the “Bank”) with interest at 6.5%, payable monthly. The RMB 23M Loan is used for short term liquidity needs. On December 28, 2017, DVPD borrowed $1,844,026 (RMB 12,000,000). The term of the loan was one year and was due on December 20, 2018. On January 19, 2018, DVPD borrowed an additional $1,690,357 (RMB 11,000,000). DVPD may choose to extend the term of the loan after obtaining prior written consent from the Bank at least 15 days prior to the maturity date. Currently, The loan agreement includes customary events of default, including DVPD’s failure to pay any principal or interest when due, becoming insolvent, or ceasing operations, or if there is a material adverse change in the assets, business, commitments, or prospects of DVPD. Upon the bank’s declaration of an event of default under the loan agreement, the Bank can demand repayment in full of principal and accrued interest. The Loan also prohibits the payment of dividends. The RMB 23M loan is secured by the same collateral as the RMB 50M loan and is guaranteed jointly by DVBM and Sino Pride.

As the date of this Annual Report, the Company has not made the repayment and the loan is in default.

On September 27, 2018, DVPD borrowed US$2,891,727 (RMB19,900,000) in a short-term loan from Harbin Bank (the “RMB 19.9M Loan”). The loan requires interest at 6.50% per annum and expired on September 12, 2019. The use of loan proceeds is restricted to pay principal and interest amounts owed to Harbin Bank.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has not made the repayment and the loan is in default.

On March 26, 2019, DVPD borrowed US$1,433,491 (RMB10,240,000 translated at September 30, 2019 exchange rate) in a short-term loan from Harbin Bank (the “RMB 10.24M Loan”, together with the RMB 23M Loan and RMB 19.9M Loan, the “Liquidity Loan Balance Due”). The loan requires interest at 6.50% per annum and expires on March 11, 2020. The use of loan proceeds is restricted to pay principal and interest amounts owed to Harbin Bank.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the RMB 10.24M Loan has been expired while the Company has not made the corresponding repayment.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Short-Terms Loans including RMB 23,000,000, RMB19,900,000, and RMB10,240,000 respectively have become due while the Company has not made the corresponding payment. The Company is not aware that the Bank has taken any legal action against the Company. In the event that the Bank rejects our Refinancing Loans and/or commence any legal proceeding against us regarding the Short-term Loans, we may lose our collateralized assets which will cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, if the collateral on those loans cannot satisfy our payment obligation, we may be forced to commence liquidation process if we do not have sufficient liquidity or cannot raise sufficient fund at that time, if any at all. 

The weighted average short-term loan balance consisting of loans from financial institutions was $7,388,091 and $4,046,028 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for short term loans was 6.50 per annum for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, interest expense incurred for the above loans, including amortization of debt issuance costs amounted to $4,147,614 and $4,131,313, respectively.

The Bank and the Company are currently discussing potential grant to convert the principal and interests due, including the RMB 390M Loan Balance Due, the RMB 50M Loan Balance Due, and the Liquidity Loan Balance Due into a new loan and an additional liquidity loans in an amount of RMB 50 million (collectively, the “Refinancing Loans”). The collateral for the potential RMB 50 million loan will be the remaining values of same collateral for the RMB 390M Loan and RMB 50M Loan but ranking junior to the RMB 390MB Loan and RMB 50M Loan. In addition, the Company has been negotiating with the Bank for a waiver of the penalty for late payment of related loan interest (the “Penalty Waiver”). The Company has already submitted the application for the Refinancing Loans at the request of the Bank. It usually takes about 2 to 3 months for the Bank to review and approve the Refinancing Loans and the Penalty Waiver which can be potentially longer as a result of the outbreak of the COVID-19. However,   there is no assurance or certainty that such Refinancing Loans or Penalty Waiver will be approved by the Bank.

Debt Maturities

As of December 31, 2019, scheduled maturities of the Company’s outstanding bank loans were as follows:

NOTE 11 – PROPERTY FINANCING AGREEMENTS PAYABLE

Property financing agreements payable consists of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

* includes lease-back payables transferred to SML

Buy-back Financing Agreements

As of December 31, 2019, 216,230 square feet (20,127 square meters) of total properties (15%) (including Group B and Group C properties-the properties transferred to SML) were sold to various unrelated individuals and entities with a buy-back option. The majority of these properties were sold in the period from 1998 to 2012. The date of buy-back options ranged from 2014 to 2018.

The Company’s accounting policy is to treat these types of sales as financing agreements. The costs of properties sold were kept under the caption of “rental properties” in the consolidated financial statements and continue to depreciate the properties over their estimated life. (see Note 5, Rental Properties, Net) The Company recorded sales proceeds as “property financing agreements payable” in the consolidated financial statements and accrues interest during the period of the buy-back option. The interest rate is determined by the price spread of each unit’s sale price and buy-back price, and the time span from the date of sale to the expiration date (last date to execute the option). In the case where the buy-back price is equal to the sales price, a bank long term lending rated is used. The amount of buy-back financing agreements represents the original proceeds from the sale of the property plus accrued interest. At the date of expiration, the amount of the buy-back financing agreements will equal the buy-back price stated in the buy-back contract.

Detailed information on property buy-back financing agreements payable in Group B as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 as follows.

The buy-back price is the price that Company has to pay when the owner of property exercises their option to have the Company buy-back the property. This price is stated in the buy-back agreement. Property financing agreements payable is the amount that the Company accrued as a liability as of the reporting date. At the date of maturity, property financing agreements payable will equal the buy-back price. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid a total of $3,474,503 (RMB 24,197,759) to the owners of property, which was recorded as a reduction of the Property Financing Agreement Payable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Property financing agreements payable will be derecognized when the buy-back amount is fully paid. In the case of settlement, the remaining unpaid balance will be reclassified from buy-back payable to other payables. The amount recorded as buy-back payables reclassified to other payables was $4,152,344 and $4,186,382 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Following table set forth the expiration of buy-back options (Group B properties) and the buy-back amount.

SML Agreement

On December 29, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement “Strategy Cooperation Agreement”, as amended on February 22, 2018 (the “SML Agreement”) with Dalian Sheng Ma Lin Trading Ltd. (“SML”). Pursuant to the SML Agreement, SML will negotiate with each individual property owner who exercised their option to request the Company to buy back the property on a case by case basis and pay an agreed price to such owner. SML will subsequently become the owner of the property and the Company had agreed to buy back the property at the initial price under the buy-back option with the previous owner no later than May 15, 2020. The Company also agreed to pay interest of 8% per annum commencing on January 1, 2018. In addition, SML will settle the lease-back payables under the lease-back agreements with each individual property owner and the Company agrees to pay SML the amount of rent payable under the lease-back plus annual interest of 8% commencing on January 1, 2018 no later than May 15, 2020.

The SML Agreement helped the Company to temporarily relieve part of pressure from disputes and expedite the settlements which will help Company to improve its credit and financial position so that the Company can focus on the Renovation. However, as of December 31, 2019, the Company has temporarily suspected it renovation projects due to its inability to raise the needed fund. SML has no relationship or affiliation with the Company other than the SML agreement. As of December 31, 2019, the properties with buy-back options totaled 319 units, 86,244 square feet (8,013 meters). Acknowledging the impact of the outbreak of COVID-19, on January 15, 2020, the Company entered into a supplemental agreement with SML to extend the original repayment date from May 15, 2020 to May 15, 2023.

Amounts under the SML Agreement as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of following:

NOTE 12 – Account Payable and accrued liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following:

* Taxes payable consist of the following:

As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Company’s taxes payable includes property tax, land use right taxes, income tax, taxes related to rental and other taxes in the aggregate amount of $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. In accordance with Chinese tax authorities and tax laws, the Company accrued tax penalties payable of $247,732 and $90,473 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

NOTE 12 – Account Payable and accrued liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following:

* Taxes payable consist of the following:

As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Company’s taxes payable includes property tax, land use right taxes, income tax, taxes related to rental and other taxes in the aggregate amount of $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. In accordance with Chinese tax authorities and tax laws, the Company accrued tax penalties payable of $247,732 and $90,473 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

NOTE 13 – LEASE LIABILITIES PAYABLE

Lease liabilities payable consisted of following as of December 31, 2019.

Leases liabilities payable consisted of following as of December 31, 2018.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, 5 lease-backs expired. For the year ended December 31, 2018, 15 lease-back leases expired. The Company did not renew those leases. The unpaid lease liability was recorded as “Other payables” in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Accumulated unpaid lease-back liabilities were $5,529,680 and $5,456,833 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

For the financing leases, the Company did not process any cash payments for the periods ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively. During the same periods, their respective weighted average remaining lease term was about one year whereas the supplemental noncash on lease liabilities resulting from right-to-use assets were approximately $779,000 and $3,870,804. For the operating leases, the Company processed cash payments of approximately $70,000 and $227,000 for the periods ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively. During the same periods, their respective weighted average remaining lease terms were about one year whereas the supplemental noncash on lease liabilities resulting from right-to-use assets were approximately $566,000 and $598,000.

A typical lease contract will include the: (i) the lease period – usually around 10 years, (ii) agreed lease payment amount, (iii) payment terms among others, The Company takes the risk after the lease is signed. The Company is liable for the agreed lease-back payment amount even if the property is vacant. Lease-back rental properties may be combined with Company owned properties together for rent depending on the needs of the tenant. The Company did not trace income separately from those lease-back properties. Rental income is reported gross including rental income from our owned properties and lease-back properties. Lease-back expenses were recorded as amortization, interest and lease-back expenses separately.

Financing lease expenses consisted of (i) amortization of the ROU asset; (ii) interest expense of the lease liability and (iii) other one-time payments including late payment reimbursement. The Company incurred $38,040 and $110,602 of amortization of ROU assets during years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company incurred $1,290 and $6,846 of interest expense in connection with financing leases for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company incurred additional expenses of $2,712 and $2,364,004 in connection with the lease-back operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The 2018 expenses are mainly guaranteed rental payments, late payment reimbursements and taxes paid on behalf of the property owners.

Operating lease expense including interest and amortization are reported as “operating lease expense” in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Operating lease expense was $599,054 and $504,401 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, including the rental expenses from the short-term leases of $307,505 and $268,778 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Future minimum lease-back payables at December 31, 2019 were as follows:

Sino Pride leases office space under an operating lease agreement which expires on August 31, 2021 and New York’s office lease expires on August 31, 2022. The future minimum rental payments are as follows:

NOTE 14 – OTHER PAYABLES

Other payables consist of the following: